Comments on: Be careful how you count in Rails http://www.motionstandingstill.com/be-careful-how-you-count/2008-09-12/ high performance ruby on rails Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:30:37 +0000 By: Jens http://www.motionstandingstill.com/be-careful-how-you-count/2008-09-12/#comment-2541 Jens Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:28:05 +0000 http://www.motionstandingstill.com/?p=132#comment-2541 Thanks for the nice article. I ran into a problem with count and named_scopes I couldn't solve. I would say it is a rails bug (still there in 2.2.2), but obviously not an urgent one. Maybe you have an idea to workaround that. (see http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/1349-named-scope-with-group-by-bug) Thanks in advance Jens Thanks for the nice article. I ran into a problem with count and named_scopes I couldn’t solve. I would say it is a rails bug (still there in 2.2.2), but obviously not an urgent one. Maybe you have an idea to workaround that. (see http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/1349-named-scope-with-group-by-bug)

Thanks in advance
Jens

]]> By: nahum http://www.motionstandingstill.com/be-careful-how-you-count/2008-09-12/#comment-2465 nahum Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:15:03 +0000 http://www.motionstandingstill.com/?p=132#comment-2465 In what way? Got an example? In what way? Got an example?

]]> By: Tim H http://www.motionstandingstill.com/be-careful-how-you-count/2008-09-12/#comment-2463 Tim H Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:10:52 +0000 http://www.motionstandingstill.com/?p=132#comment-2463 Have just been bitten by this combined with named scopes. Seems named scopes breaks associations a little. Have just been bitten by this combined with named scopes. Seems named scopes breaks associations a little.

]]>