<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Starting simple with Rails caching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motionstandingstill.com/starting-simple-with-rails-caching/2008-11-27/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motionstandingstill.com/starting-simple-with-rails-caching/2008-11-27/</link>
	<description>high performance ruby on rails</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:44:05 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michal</title>
		<link>http://www.motionstandingstill.com/starting-simple-with-rails-caching/2008-11-27/comment-page-1/#comment-2543</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motionstandingstill.com/?p=195#comment-2543</guid>
		<description>Nice writeup.
I agree that the very very important thing is to keep the whole caching system maintainable and simple. And this approach of caching smaller fragments seems to help with that.
Hope to read more from you on the topic soon.
Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice writeup.<br />
I agree that the very very important thing is to keep the whole caching system maintainable and simple. And this approach of caching smaller fragments seems to help with that.<br />
Hope to read more from you on the topic soon.<br />
Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.516 seconds -->
