http://www.motionstandingstill.com/why-not-passenger-mod_rails/2008-07-22/ high performance ruby on rails Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:19:02 +0000 http://www.motionstandingstill.com/why-not-passenger-mod_rails/2008-07-22/#comment-2413 nahum Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:42:48 +0000 http://www.motionstandingstill.com/?p=19#comment-2413 I'd read that Rails 2.1 with Ruby 1.8.7 was snappier, but nothing much about view issues. I've done a bit of a google and not found anything, what sort of problems are you experiencing? I'm not looking at migrating an existing app for this project so likely won't face similar type of issues I'm guessing. I’d read that Rails 2.1 with Ruby 1.8.7 was snappier, but nothing much about view issues. I’ve done a bit of a google and not found anything, what sort of problems are you experiencing?
I’m not looking at migrating an existing app for this project so likely won’t face similar type of issues I’m guessing.

]]> http://www.motionstandingstill.com/why-not-passenger-mod_rails/2008-07-22/#comment-2412 Mukund Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:22:33 +0000 http://www.motionstandingstill.com/?p=19#comment-2412 Use Ruby 1.8.6 with the last stable patch with Rails 2.1. I face render issues on my partials with Ruby 1.8.7 and Rails 2.1. The new version of Ruby is snappier though. Use Ruby 1.8.6 with the last stable patch with Rails 2.1. I face render issues on my partials with Ruby 1.8.7 and Rails 2.1. The new version of Ruby is snappier though.

]]>